S-Cross review

author: FutureCar Staff    

The Suzuki S-Cross, despite being around since 2013, remains competitive with newer rivals. It has undergone continual updates, including the addition of two hybrid systems that offer efficiency comparable to other compact SUVs. The S-Cross also offers plenty of standard tech at a competitive price. However, its dated interior and lack of refinement are drawbacks. Our recommended choice is the Suzuki S-Cross Motion Mild Hybrid.

The Suzuki S-Cross was initially introduced as the Suzuki SX4 S-Cross in 2013. It came with a range of petrol and diesel engines. Since then, the popularity of diesel has declined and hybrid rivals like the Hyundai Tucson, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Austral, and Toyota RAV4 have emerged. To keep up, the S-Cross now offers two petrol hybrid engine options. The first is the mild-hybrid 1.4 Boosterjet 48v, which competes with other mild-hybrid rivals. The second is the pricier 1.5-litre Hybrid S-Cross, available with two- or four-wheel drive. The mild-hybrid system provides assistance to the engine for better fuel efficiency. The S-Cross offers a comfortable ride and decent handling, although it lacks the sharpness of some competitors. The downside is its light steering and lack of grip compared to models like the Ford Kuga. However, the S-Cross absorbs bumps well and provides a calm ride at high speeds.

The Suzuki S-Cross is available in two trim levels: Motion and Ultra. Motion offers plenty of standard equipment, while Ultra comes exclusively with AllGrip four-wheel drive. The pricing of the S-Cross puts it in the range of hybrid-powered small SUVs and undercuts many family SUVs. However, the S-Cross is smaller than contemporary family SUVs and falls between two classes in terms of interior space.

The S-Cross offers a choice of two engines. The turbocharged 1.4-litre engine is the cheapest and most powerful option. It has mild-hybrid technology for a boost in performance. The naturally aspirated 1.5-litre Hybrid engine is less powerful and comes with a frustrating six-speed automated manual. The S-Cross lacks the refinement of its technical partner, Toyota, which produces more refined hybrid cars like the Suzuki Across and Suzuki Swace.

The S-Cross offers good fuel economy and emissions compared to hybrid rivals, but its predicted depreciation is steep. The 1.5 Hybrid in two-wheel drive form is the most efficient, while the 1.4 Boosterjet four-wheel drive has the lowest fuel economy. The S-Cross has a simple and functional interior design, but it lacks the plush materials and advanced technology of its modern rivals. The infotainment screen feels aftermarket, and the S-Cross does not offer a fully digital instrument cluster.

The S-Cross provides plenty of room up front, but it is smaller than many rivals in terms of overall size. The driving position does not offer a commanding view compared to competitors. The S-Cross has a decent view out, and Ultra versions come with a surround-view camera system. The boot space is smaller than some competitors, especially in the 1.5-litre Hybrid model due to the battery pack.

FutureCar Staff